jadenbane's Journal
Friday, March 31st, 2006

Date:2006-03-31 20:14
Subject:
Security:Public
Mood: creative
Music:Raglan Baroque Players - Concerto No. 2 In A Major

A year and a bit ago Derek and I came up with a game, an obsequiously arithmetic game. Since the game's rules have been layed down once or twice in various notebooks, and then been promptly forgotten, I'll make an attempt at putting down an authoritative edition of the rules.

Six Handed Suicide

trick-taking game for two players. The object being to collect as many points as possible.

A standard deck of 52 cards is dealt out between the two players, giving 26 cards per player. Each opponent takes two cards from their opponent and reserves these as a personal kitty of cards. This leaves 24 cards per player, their deck. Each player's deck is to be played in tricks of four card hands, and thus the game's name (4 cards / trick * 6 tricks = 24 cards.)

Each trick is played out as follows. 

Both players takes four cards from the top of their decks. Then each player chooses a single card from their hand which their opponent has to 'match.' Matching a card consists of using up to three of the remaining cards in your hand to get a value less than or equal to the numerical value of the card being matched; if a player cannot put down a combination of cards which is lower than the card being matched their "trick" is zero, and their hand is discarded. However, if a player can match the value a card, they subtract the value of the cards put down from the card being matched. Then the difference of the cards is subtracted from the total in their hand and this is their "trick." Once both players have tried to match, the player with the highest trick subtracts the lower player's trick from their own and adds this value to their score. This is done six times, and then each player reveals their kitty and uses all the cards in their hand to attempt a "match." Whoever has collected the most points from tricks wins.

The only special case is when someone plays the king of hearts. Usually it is used as a trick card which your opponent has to match, however it is considered unmatchable and the person playing it simply adds the value of their hand to their score.

Ex. 1

Player A recieves a hand of  8♠ 4♥ 3♣ J♦ 
Player A puts down: 8♠

Player B recieves a hand of J♠ 9♠ 2♣ A♦ 
Player B puts down: 9♠

B Plays
Player A has to match 9♠ and Player B has to match 8♠. Neither can get exactly on the card they have to match so Player A plays 4♥ 3♣. This means that for the trick A has a difference of 9♠ - (4♥+3♣) = 2 and since B can only play 2♣ they'll have a difference of 8♠ - 2♣ = 6. This gives A a trick of J♦ - 2 = 9 and B a trick of (J♠ + A♦) - 7 = 18. Since B's trick is higher B adds (18 - 9) = 9 to their total.




1 comment | post a comment



Date:2006-03-31 21:30
Subject:ENGU 4U ILRP ESSAY OUTLINE
Security:Public
Mood:tired
Music:Astor Piazzolla - Verano Porteno - Summer In Buenos Aires

Name: Jaden Bane

Author: Franz Kafka

Story #1: Kafka, F. "The Judgement" Collected Stories. Trans. Willam and Edwin Muir
               New York: Random House 1993

Story #2: Kafka, F. "The Stoker" Collected Stories. Trans. Willam and Edwin Muir
               New York: Random House 1993

Secondary Source #1: Levi, Mijal: Kafka and Anarchism
                New York: Revisionist Press 1972.

Secondary Source #2: Poltizer, Henry: Franz Kafka: Parable and Paradox
                New York: Cornell University Press 1966.




Proposed Thesis: Kafka feels man is powerless to the beauraucratic machines around him, cs he is a slave to a higher authority. Need to indicate how he shows this (stage of progression or stylistic means.) (Are these complementary statements? Is the "higher authority," the "beuraucratic machine?")

 EXCELLENT/SOLIDGOOD POTENTIAL / [REFINING NEEDED]  WEAK / INAPPROPRIATE / UNCLEAR

 3

 [2]

 1

Topic Sentence #1: Georg's father is a depressing figure who opresses Georg. Which part of the thesis does this support?

Supporting Points:
  • First paragraph of "The Judgement" is free open ?
  • When Georg enters his father's room he is stunned by its darkness 'meaning' what ?
  • Georg describes his father an enormous man, giving him an over powering personality indirectly not quite clear

Critical Support:

  • "Yet nowhere do we find any indication Old Bendemann could have forgiven his son."
  • "When Georg enters [his father's room] he is struck by the darkness that revails the room produced and reflects claustrophobia."
  • Pathetic Fallacy

Topic Sentence #2: Georg when told to drown himself does not question 'the Jedgement' but submits to it, since he considers his father's rule absolute.

Supporting Points:

  • Georg kills himself expediently
  • He never questions the judgement
  • He still respects his father

p #'s

Critical Support:

  • Old Bendemann hold absolute absolute power only for this one son." (Politzer, p. 62)

 Topic Sentence #3: Georg and The Stoker are both victims of impersonal or unreasonable opression.

Supporting Points:
  • Georg is opressed by his Father
  • The Stoker is opressed by his Roumanian Chief Engineer Schubal
  • Neither give exact causes why

You'd need to show the impersonality or unreasonableness to prove your point."

Cirtical Support:

  • "In  dark allusions he blanes the conditions, 'the way things run', for a fate from which, we are made to feel, he will never be able to escape." (Polizter, p130)

 Topic Sentences:  4 [3] 2 1 
 Supporting Points:  4 [3] 2 1
 Critical Support:  [4] 3 2 1
  Excellent / Solid Satisfactory Needs Improvement Very Weak

    Topic sentences need to tie clearly to the thesis.

    </font></font>

    post a comment


    browse days
    my journal